Written by

,

Squeezed between lectures is a 10 minute break where students can go to the bathroom, get a drink of water or have a cigarette. In this time, I usually take a quick walk around the campus to move my legs and squint at the sunshine. Thus far, I’ve made unconventional routes through Glebe and once, accidentally through the construction site which has over-run the university during the summer break. Today, I made my walk through the famous Quadrangle, home to the higher-level administration and the meticulously cut, photogenic lawns that host graduation ceremonies. I wandered into the Nicholson museum and there was a wonderful little exhibition – Sigmund Freud’s Collection: An Archaeology of the Mind. Amongst the antiquities are some charming photographs of the man at work and home movies made by his daughter Anna.

There is also his famous couch.

I still like Freud. No one in the field of psychology seems to. There appears to be a general dismissal of the man and his theories, as well as a minor irritation about the wide-scale appeal and influence of his ideas. The pursuit for scientific knowledge flushes out anything that can’t be proven with statistics and solid evidence, so Freud gets taught in peculiar subjects by even stranger scholars wedged in odd pockets of the Arts faculty. I wonder if there is a study on how people interpret his theories in everyday life. There has to be some scientific explanation as to why he is so popular to this day and why ‘Freud for Beginners’ always graces the bookshop shelves.

There’s a series of lectures and talks coinciding with the exhibition, you can check them out here.

2 responses

  1. Adrian avatar

    Yo Cecelia, I’m all for freud (of course). people don’t like freud because they never read him, but they got some semblance of his ideas that was spewed out by a bunch of half-wits teaching educational development theories in anglo speeking countries since the 1950s. the metapsychology of freud which contains his most brilliant papers is almost never read, so people reject Freud over some hollywood shit about Oedipus and oral/anal/phallic stages of development. On the science point, they mean scientific empiricism, which was circumvented my most philosophers in the 19th century. Robyn Ferrell’s Passion in Theory is the best into to how psychoanalysis reframes the very question of science by looking at what science excludes…. I would say that scientific empricism is not scientific enough!
    Anway, I’m not sure if that is the famous couch… I thought i saw the real one in vienna:
    http://members.westnet.com.au/aemilsen/freud.html
    I’d love to go to some of those talks.

  2. Cecelia avatar
    Cecelia

    Yeah, I think you would have seen this one in London. I don’t he think he took his Viennese couch with him when he migrated to the UK, especially if it’s that one- looks nasty. Maybe it was on a patient feedback survey, he decided to go with something cushier with rugs?

Leave a Reply