I’ve been told I’m deficient in a lot of areas (conscientiousness, attention-span, cardiovascular fitness, height- just to name a few) and I’ve been labelled some pretty unglamourous titles (Westie, alliterate [sic], ‘Asian driver’ [?!]) but the other night I received my most esoteric insult yet. I was accused, in a most disparaging tone, that I didn’t get it because I am just not a ‘geek’. It was in response to my indifference to a (top-secret) new contraption that is being purpose-built into the living room and is hoped to be the key feature of our September belated-Christmas-in-July get-together. I figured for the same outlay a supply of alcoholic beverages, high-in-saturated-fat-salty snacks and a good sound system would be enough to get a party started but hey, what do I know about festivities? I spent my University days at Art School…
However, I thought I would do the ‘geeky’ thing and before retaliating in a potentially passive-aggressive way (like going off to my room and blogging about it) I would enumerate the key ‘geek’ attributes that are missing in my personality which have lead me to this sorry state of unenlightment.
- My scientific method to problem-solving involves changing all variables at once and hoping for the best.
- I don’t log personal behaviours in an Excel spreadsheet.
- I don’t read. (Okay, I’m not proud of that but I’m trying my best.)
- I don’t buy my clothes online.
- I don’t use statistics as empirical evidence for household arguments.
- I don’t ask for “more data points” when I need more information.
- I use a pre-made CMS for my websites, the idea of coding is terrifying.
- I prefer to apply the Principle of Parsimony over the Law of Complexity when I need to give an explanation.
- I get things wrong and I don’t have a problem with that.
- I don’t watch bad science fiction out of loyalty to the genre or a fascination with spaceships.
- I first use an exploratory trial-and-error method before reading the user manual when it comes to setting-up electrical goods.
- I don’t think that human behaviour can be modeled with maths. I accept that humans are often illogical, unpredictable and downright perverse.
- I type in whole sentences rather than keywords with Boolean operators in a Google search.
- I don’t understand basic physics or chemistry and I use a calculator for the sorts of simple arithmetic I used to be able to do in my head in primary school.
- I don’t believe the toaster has a micro-processor. I believe the ‘Cancel’ button is a simple mechanical switch.
- I do not have a problem maintaining conversations with friends/acquaintances/colleagues/random strangers, even in topics that I don’t understand, fully endorse or believe in. Which brings me to the point of-
- I don’t get excited about the Evolution/Creationism debate or consider it to be the final victory for Science in the Science versus Religion (circa Galileo affair – now) War. I don’t look on people who maintain religious belief with a smug sense of superiority.
Besides if the Bible had anything to say about evolution, was it not Matthew during the Sermon on the Mount who stated
Blessed are the geeks: for they shall inherit the earth?
Go here for a more comprehensive list Geek Behaviours.

2 responses
hehe interesting analysis. and an interesting counter point to the whole geek chic shstic
I just found out about your prolific blog activity and I had a really good time reading the whole thing.
Keep it up :)
Olivier